Skip to main content

Tort Liability and Employment Law: Intertwined Concepts

Tort liability and employment law have a long and intertwined history. The "control test," initially used by English courts to determine employee status, originated in tort law. Employers can be held liable for damages caused by their employees to third parties and property, provided an employment relationship exists and the employee acted under the employer's control or direction. The evolution of tort liability has often mirrored developments in employment law. A crucial element in establishing employer liability is whether the individual who caused the damage was indeed an employee. This determination rests on the definition of "employee" as established by employment law. Civil courts adjudicating tort claims must interpret the Employment and Labor Law to ascertain the existence of an employment contract between the employer and the injured party. The court cannot apply a different standard for employee identification than the one defined in the Employment ...
Post a Comment

C011 - Right of Association (Agriculture) Convention, 1921 (No. 11)

C011 - Right of Association (Agriculture) Convention, 1921 (No. 11)

Convention concerning the Rights of Association and Combination of Agricultural Workers (Entry into force: 11 May 1923)

Adoption: Geneva, 3rd ILC session (25 Oct 1921)

Preamble

The General Conference of the International Labour Organisation,

Having been convened at Geneva by the Governing Body of the International Labour Office, and having met in its Third Session on 25 October 1921, and

Having decided upon the adoption of certain proposals with regard to the rights of association and combination of agricultural workers, which is included in the fourth item of the agenda of the Session, and

Having determined that these proposals shall take the form of an international Convention,

adopts the following Convention, which may be cited as the Right of Association (Agriculture) Convention, 1921, for ratification by the Members of the International Labour Organisation in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution of the International Labour Organisation:

Article 1

Each Member of the International Labour Organisation which ratifies this Convention undertakes to secure to all those engaged in agriculture the same rights of association and combination as to industrial workers, and to repeal any statutory or other provisions restricting such rights in the case of those engaged in agriculture.

Article 2

The formal ratifications of this Convention, under the conditions set forth in the Constitution of the International Labour Organisation, shall be communicated to the Director-General of the International Labour Office for registration.

Article 3
  1. 1. This Convention shall come into force at the date on which the ratifications of two Members of the International Labour Organisation have been registered by the Director-General.
  2. 2. It shall be binding only upon those Members whose ratifications have been registered with the International Labour Office.
  3. 3. Thereafter, the Convention shall come into force for any member at the date on which its ratification has been registered with the International Labour Office.
Article 4

As soon as the ratifications of two Members of the International Labour Organisation have been registered with the International Labour Office, the Director-General of the International Labour Office shall so notify all the Members of the International Labour Organisation. He shall likewise notify them of the registration of the ratifications which may be communicated subsequently by other Members of the Organisation.

Article 5

Subject to the provisions of Article 3, each Member which ratifies this Convention agrees to bring the provisions of Articles 1 into operation not later than 1 January 1924, and to take such action as may be necessary to make these provisions effective.

Article 6

Each Member of the International Labour Organisation which ratifies this Convention engages to apply it to its colonies, possessions and protectorates, in accordance with the provisions of Article 35 of the Constitution of the International Labour Organisation.

Article 7

A Member which has ratified this Convention may denounce it after the expiration of ten years from the date on which the Convention first comes into force, by an act communicated to the Director-General of the International Labour Office for registration. Such denunciation shall not take effect until one year after the date on which it is registered with the International Labour Office.

Article 8

At such times as it may consider necessary the Governing Body of the International Labour Office shall present to the General Conference a report on the working of this Convention and shall examine the desirability of placing on the agenda of the Conference the question of its revision in whole or in part.

Article 9

The French and English texts of this Convention shall both be authentic.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Settlement of Individual and Collective Labour Disputes under Ethiopian Labour Law

Hiruy Wubie [*] E-Journal of International and Comparative LABOUR STUDIES DOWNLOAD PDF Introductory Remarks The settlement of labour disputes is a precondition for a harmonious working environment. Clarity of laws governing labour relations, as well as their consistent and adequate implementation, contributes to the establishment of a dependable system of dispute settlement. Pursuant to Ethiopian labour law, labour disputes are classified as individual and collective, and a number of bodies are in charge of resolving these disputes. Yet confusion on the criteria used to draw a distinction between individual and collective labour disputes brings about major issues in terms of interpretation and implementation of relevant legal rules and judicial decisions.
5 comments
Read more

Key Ethiopian Labor Law Cases: Work Certificates, Wages, and Employment Rights

Introduction Ethiopian labor law, primarily governed by Proclamation No. 377/1996 and its amendments ( Proclamation No. 1156/2011 ), provides a robust framework for addressing employment disputes. This blog post examines key cassation cases that clarify legal obligations regarding work experience certificates, wage disputes, termination procedures, and employee rights during business restructuring. These cases underscore the importance of statutory compliance and procedural fairness in Ethiopia’s labor law framework. Work Experience Certificates Case No. 215642 (Dec 27, 2015 E.C.): Pilot Work Experience Certificates Key Legal Rule : Per Case No. 111337 and Article 12(8) of Proclamation No. 1156/2011 , employers are not required to include flight hours in a pilot’s work experience certificate. This interpretation remains consistent with the law’s intent, and no legal basis exists to amend it. Context and Outcome : The cassation bench upheld the prior ruling that flight hours are not ...
Post a Comment
Read more