Skip to main content

Tort Liability and Employment Law: Intertwined Concepts

Tort liability and employment law have a long and intertwined history. The "control test," initially used by English courts to determine employee status, originated in tort law. Employers can be held liable for damages caused by their employees to third parties and property, provided an employment relationship exists and the employee acted under the employer's control or direction. The evolution of tort liability has often mirrored developments in employment law. A crucial element in establishing employer liability is whether the individual who caused the damage was indeed an employee. This determination rests on the definition of "employee" as established by employment law. Civil courts adjudicating tort claims must interpret the Employment and Labor Law to ascertain the existence of an employment contract between the employer and the injured party. The court cannot apply a different standard for employee identification than the one defined in the Employment ...

Constitution of the International Labour Organization Instrument of Amendment Ratification Proclamation No. 128-1998

 WHEREAS, the General Conference of the International Labour Organization adopted the Instrument for the Amendment of the Constitution of the International Labour Organization on the 19th day of June, 1997;

WHEREAS, the House of Peoples’ Representatives has ratified said Instrument; at its session held on the 27th day of October, 1998;

NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with Article 55 sub-Articles (1) and (12) of the Constitution, it is hereby proclaimed as follows:

1. Short Title

This Proclamation may be cited as the “Constitution of the International Labour Organization Instrument of Amendment Ratification Proclamation No. 128/1998.”

2. Ratification of the Instrument of Amendment

The Constitution of the International Labour organization Instrument of Amendment, adopted by the General Conference of international labour organization on the 19th day of June 1997, is ratified.

3. Effective Date

This Proclamation shall enter into force as of the 27th day of October, 1998.

Done at Addis Ababa this 27th day of October, 1998.

NEGASO GIDADA (DR.)

PRESIDENT OF THE FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Settlement of Individual and Collective Labour Disputes under Ethiopian Labour Law

Hiruy Wubie [*] E-Journal of International and Comparative LABOUR STUDIES DOWNLOAD PDF Introductory Remarks The settlement of labour disputes is a precondition for a harmonious working environment. Clarity of laws governing labour relations, as well as their consistent and adequate implementation, contributes to the establishment of a dependable system of dispute settlement. Pursuant to Ethiopian labour law, labour disputes are classified as individual and collective, and a number of bodies are in charge of resolving these disputes. Yet confusion on the criteria used to draw a distinction between individual and collective labour disputes brings about major issues in terms of interpretation and implementation of relevant legal rules and judicial decisions.

Judicial Limitations on Employer’s Power of Transfer of Workers

In almost all levels of the judiciary, one could hardly find any decision interpreting or applying the provisions of the labour proclamation dealing with variation of employment contract. It is not because they didn’t encounter disputes relating to variation, rather the reason lies in their failure to relate the law with the relevant facts of the case. Variation implies making changes to the terms and conditions of the contract. Two important elements of the terms and conditions are the job duties and work location. A contract of employment is a legally binding agreement: the two parties are bound by its terms and it is enforceable in law. An employer wishing to make changes should first obtain consent of the worker.