Skip to main content

Tort Liability and Employment Law: Intertwined Concepts

Tort liability and employment law have a long and intertwined history. The "control test," initially used by English courts to determine employee status, originated in tort law. Employers can be held liable for damages caused by their employees to third parties and property, provided an employment relationship exists and the employee acted under the employer's control or direction. The evolution of tort liability has often mirrored developments in employment law. A crucial element in establishing employer liability is whether the individual who caused the damage was indeed an employee. This determination rests on the definition of "employee" as established by employment law. Civil courts adjudicating tort claims must interpret the Employment and Labor Law to ascertain the existence of an employment contract between the employer and the injured party. The court cannot apply a different standard for employee identification than the one defined in the Employment ...

Foreign Direct Investment vis-à-vis Labour Law in Ethiopia: Is Race-to-the-Bottom an Existing, Impending or Illusory Menace?

Bereket Alemayehu Hagos* 

(Labour Relations Law in Ethiopia

EDITOR Mehari Redae (PhD) 

DOWNLOAD PDF

Abstract 

In line with the global trend, Ethiopia has been involved in the competition with other countries to attract and retain foreign direct investment (FDI). For this purpose, the Ethiopian government has been taking various measures, which include providing different incentives to foreign investors. This article finds some evidence, focusing on foreign investments in the Ethiopian industrial parks, that the government has been engaged in a race-to-the-bottom with respect to labour standards, a phenomenon that harms the rights and interests of workers.

 

Thus, the problem of race-to-the-bottom on labour standards exists in Ethiopia. The race-to-the-bottom has been manifested through the government’s reluctance to enforce the labour standards provided in the Ethiopian labour law (particularly the core labour standards) in order not to “discourage” foreign investors. 

Since such approach to promoting foreign investment is contrary to the grand goal of sustainable development, the article provides some thoughts on how the Ethiopian government can balance its interests of promoting foreign investment with the protection of the rights of workers. These include promoting FDI through fiscal and financial incentives instead of the reluctance to enforce labour standards, while ensuring that foreign investors comply with the labour law so as to protect the rights of workers. Key Terms: Investment, foreign direct investment, FDI, investment law, labour law, labour standards, core labour standards, race-to-the-bottom, sustainable development. 

 

* LL.M. Candidate in Comparative Law, Economics and Finance (University of Turin and International University College of Turin), LL.M. in International Business Law (Central European University), LL.B. (Addis Ababa University).The author can be reached at alemayehu.bereket@yahoo.com. He thanks the anonymous reviewers for providing constructive comments on the draft of the article and Dr. Mehari Redae for providing his insightful comments on the draft of the article and for editing it.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Settlement of Individual and Collective Labour Disputes under Ethiopian Labour Law

Hiruy Wubie [*] E-Journal of International and Comparative LABOUR STUDIES DOWNLOAD PDF Introductory Remarks The settlement of labour disputes is a precondition for a harmonious working environment. Clarity of laws governing labour relations, as well as their consistent and adequate implementation, contributes to the establishment of a dependable system of dispute settlement. Pursuant to Ethiopian labour law, labour disputes are classified as individual and collective, and a number of bodies are in charge of resolving these disputes. Yet confusion on the criteria used to draw a distinction between individual and collective labour disputes brings about major issues in terms of interpretation and implementation of relevant legal rules and judicial decisions.

Judicial Limitations on Employer’s Power of Transfer of Workers

In almost all levels of the judiciary, one could hardly find any decision interpreting or applying the provisions of the labour proclamation dealing with variation of employment contract. It is not because they didn’t encounter disputes relating to variation, rather the reason lies in their failure to relate the law with the relevant facts of the case. Variation implies making changes to the terms and conditions of the contract. Two important elements of the terms and conditions are the job duties and work location. A contract of employment is a legally binding agreement: the two parties are bound by its terms and it is enforceable in law. An employer wishing to make changes should first obtain consent of the worker.