Skip to main content

Tort Liability and Employment Law: Intertwined Concepts

Tort liability and employment law have a long and intertwined history. The "control test," initially used by English courts to determine employee status, originated in tort law. Employers can be held liable for damages caused by their employees to third parties and property, provided an employment relationship exists and the employee acted under the employer's control or direction. The evolution of tort liability has often mirrored developments in employment law. A crucial element in establishing employer liability is whether the individual who caused the damage was indeed an employee. This determination rests on the definition of "employee" as established by employment law. Civil courts adjudicating tort claims must interpret the Employment and Labor Law to ascertain the existence of an employment contract between the employer and the injured party. The court cannot apply a different standard for employee identification than the one defined in the Employment ...

Labour Rights in Industrial Parks: Lessons for Ethiopia

 Mehari Redae (PhD)* 

(Labour Relations Law in Ethiopia

EDITOR Mehari Redae (PhD) 

DOWNLOAD PDF


Abstract 

It is well known that Ethiopia’s Growth and Transformation Plan (GTP) and economic development strategy claims to aspire for fast, sustainable and inclusive development. With this purpose in view, it, among other things, embarked upon massive industrialization process by establishing the so called “Industrial Parks”. Terms such as ‘Export Processing Zones’; ‘Free Zones’; ‘Special Economic Zones’ and ‘Industrial Parks’ refer to basically the same concept with slightly different objectives. They have become the most common instruments of industrial promotion policy in developing countries. Many developing countries see export promotion as an important policy instrument for economic growth.

 

It is mainly for export enhancement that these locations have been established. Overall, their record, on the economic front, has been positive. Other than economic growth, such enclaves have been entrusted with the responsibility of generating massive employment as well. Since, the industries operating therein have been mainly labour intensive manufacturing facilities; their mission of employment generating exercise has also been predominantly attained.  

However, economic growth and employment generation, though necessary are not sufficient by themselves. In addition to these, how growth has been shared together with quality and sustainability of such employment are equally and crucially important. Leaving aside the issue of benefit sharing to other studies, in the quality of employment front, there are concerns that in such locations labour standards tend to be eroded and high turnover of labour have been registered, which militate against quality and sustainability of employment. Employment devoid of dignity and decency is bound to cultivate demotivated (if not ill motivated) labour force that will possess a mindset of “they pretend to pay us we pretend to work.” 

It is difficult to accomplish fast, sustainable and inclusive economic development with a labour force having such an adverse mental disposition. In fact, for the benefit of sustainability, wealth which is generated through economic growth needs to be equitably shared.  Hence both sides of the equation (i.e. economic growth and labour protection) need to be regularly checked and monitored. This paper will try to assess how other jurisdictions managed to regulate the issue of labour at the so called “Industrial Parks” and the challenge they encountered so that Ethiopia can learn and unlearn from their experiences.

 

* Associate Professor; AAU, College of Law and Governance Studies; School of Law.  He can be reached at: me2ha1@yahoo.com.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Settlement of Individual and Collective Labour Disputes under Ethiopian Labour Law

Hiruy Wubie [*] E-Journal of International and Comparative LABOUR STUDIES DOWNLOAD PDF Introductory Remarks The settlement of labour disputes is a precondition for a harmonious working environment. Clarity of laws governing labour relations, as well as their consistent and adequate implementation, contributes to the establishment of a dependable system of dispute settlement. Pursuant to Ethiopian labour law, labour disputes are classified as individual and collective, and a number of bodies are in charge of resolving these disputes. Yet confusion on the criteria used to draw a distinction between individual and collective labour disputes brings about major issues in terms of interpretation and implementation of relevant legal rules and judicial decisions.

Judicial Limitations on Employer’s Power of Transfer of Workers

In almost all levels of the judiciary, one could hardly find any decision interpreting or applying the provisions of the labour proclamation dealing with variation of employment contract. It is not because they didn’t encounter disputes relating to variation, rather the reason lies in their failure to relate the law with the relevant facts of the case. Variation implies making changes to the terms and conditions of the contract. Two important elements of the terms and conditions are the job duties and work location. A contract of employment is a legally binding agreement: the two parties are bound by its terms and it is enforceable in law. An employer wishing to make changes should first obtain consent of the worker.